Request Information RFI): Expansion sharing standardization NIH-funded human brain imaging data Notice Number: NOT-DA-11-021 Key Dates Release Date: August 26, 2011 Response Date: Received October 14, 2011 Issued NIH Blueprint Neuroscience Research
http://neuroscienceblueprint.nih.gov) National Institute Mental Health NIMH) National Eye Institute NEI) National Center Complementary Alternative Medicine NCCAM) National Institute Aging NIA) National Institute Alcohol Abuse Alcoholism NIAAA) National Institute Biomedical Imaging Bioengineering NIBIB) National Institute Child Health Human Development NICHD) National Institute Deafness Other Communication Disorders NIDCD) National Institute Dental Craniofacial Research NIDCR) National Institute Drug Abuse NIDA) National Institute Environmental Health Sciences NIEHS) National Institute General Medical Sciences NIGMS) National Institute Neurological Disorders Stroke NINDS) National Institute Nursing Research NINR) Office Behavioral Social Sciences Research OBSSR) Purpose Request Information RFI) for information planning purposes only, should be construed a solicitation as obligation the part the Federal Government, National Institutes Health NIH), NIH Blueprint Neuroscience Research Blueprint), and/or National Institute Drug Abuse NIDA). NIH does intend make any awards based responses this RFI to otherwise pay the preparation any information submitted for Government's of such information. Blueprint Workgroup Neuromaging Data-Sharing the Blueprint Lifespan Human Connectome Project Team seeking input the scientific community, health professionals, patient advocates, community-based organizations, students, the general public the administrative technical issues involved removing barriers the sharing human brain imaging data collected using NIH support. input include is limited to) issues potential solutions related image hosting, well the adoption standardized scanning procedures, imaging protocols, phenotypic characterization, data formats. particular interest input regarding human-subjects protection confidentiality issues. Definitions: Standardization, the purpose this Notice, defined the joint adoption across multiple laboratories institutions) either: a) specific neuro-image acquisition parameters, b) image processing processes after image collection reconstruction, c) specific instruments collateral phenotypic characterization, d) data formats definitions, e) data de-identification, f) potential post-facto algorithms schemes harmonizing data collected under different parameters data definitions. Sharing, the purpose this Notice, defined either actual transfer brain image data the laboratory infrastructure initial data collection simply enabling dynamic access image data remains stored the institution its collection. either case, image data be annotated demographic other phenotypic information sufficient detail secondary data analysis. Transferred data be sent directly a particular laboratory either through centralized referral hub, bilaterally request), alternatively furnished one more common repository infrastructures. Background NIH Blueprint Neuroscience Research endorses principle standardization open-access brain imaging data. example, Blueprint-funded Human Connectome Project HCP) promises provide neuroscience community easy access well-annotated raw processed data secondary analyses potential federation other datasets. Alternatively, 1000 Functional Connectomes Project FC1000) a consortium-based dataset comprised primarily resting-state functional connectivity data obtained healthy human subjects dozens individual laboratories Biswal et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2010);107(10):4734-9). consortium provided evidence federated brain image datasets successfully compiled secondary analysis, especially exploratory investigations. developing distribution/sharing infrastructure the HCP, well success the FC1000, fostered only nascent grass-roots efforts pool donated image data secondary analysis, has also increased interest the NIH Blueprint fostering expansion open-access neuroimage data NIH-funded grants, contracts, cooperative agreements, where standardization across labs significantly facilitate ease federation. Expanded sharing image data be further enhanced increased standardization across laboratories repositories, holds potential significant value-added investigations the human brain relatively minimal expense. example, assembly data across different research projects allow investigations genetic behavioral associations require sample sizes statistical power too large any laboratory collect. Alternatively, assembly image data collected across multiple laboratories enable investigations comparing brain metrics across disease states span programmatic foci different NIH institutes centers. Despite potential, however, few laboratories institutions currently provide easy access stored neuroimage related meta-data. Information Requested NIH Blueprint interested removing barriers sharing order expand access NIH-funded neuroimage data secondary data analysis meta-analysis. RFI seeks information will help NIH Blueprint: a) identify interest, utility, preferences, potential technical administrative challenges overcoming barriers data-sharing, b) expand standardization brain image data, c) facilitate sharing brain image data. Individual members the scientific community, scientific organizations, healthcare professionals, patient advocates, the public invited provide commentary the following items: 1. Describe current barriers the standardization sharing neuroimaging data secondary analysis. Responses include comments suggestions strategies incentivize data sharing. a. Mandatory condition award mandated journals) b. Incentives promote voluntary sharing adoption standard procedures c. Technical infrastructure/IT barriers 2. Considerations human-subjects protections a. Issues experiences related informed consent subjects their data be: stored indefinitely stored a repository than the laboratory data collection available third parties secondary analysis b. Issues related subject confidentiality, respect de-identification brain image data potential identification subjects based brain images such gyrus sulcus morphology) extent access secondary analysis HIPAA compliance 3. Suitability different image data modalities donation federation across labs, utility different image modalities secondary analysis a. Resting-state task-evoked functional MRI b. Structural MRI e.g. diffusion volumetric) c. image modalities MRS PET d. Reconciling need standardization versus value methods innovation 4. Conditions qualifications under data should shared a. Applicant eligibility qualifications; composition data access committee b. Data quality sample size c. Embargo collecting lab duration) before furnishing data d. Financial considerations e.g. fee-for-access, current NIH funding status) 5. Existing including international) efforts, large scale databases, clearing houses, tools, resources facilitate sharing imaging data a. Lessons learned b. Features suitability up-scaling accommodate data- especially different modalities, with different linked phenotypic data c. Methods harmonizing data different extant emerging extramural repositories 6. Issues standardization, sharing, maintenance image data linked phenotypic genetic data a. Advantages, disadvantages, costs centralized repositories versus distributed hosting b. Computational infrastructure, database management, data processing software/algorithms c. Data meta-data formats, common data elements d. Challenges, costs, sources, other issues long-term data storage curation) e. Linking image data genetic genomic data f. Interface centralized referral hubs, HCP, similar NIH-initiated infrastructures 7. Issues phenotypic harmonization definitions respect to: a. Developmentally-sensitive measures suitability different life stages) b. Objective behavioral metrics c. Psychometric measures d. Psychiatric disorders, brain disorders, histories substance e. Family history, environmental other psychosocial factors f. Expansion use a mandate) adopt consensus phenotypic measures NIH Blueprint also welcomes any additional comments suggestions regard considerations mentioned above. Note: Responses NOT-DA-11-008 Request Information RFI): Creation A Consortium-Based Repository fMRI-Based Connectivity Brain Scans Substance-Using Abusing Clinical Research Participants be collated responses this RFI. Responses be accepted until October 14, 2011 via email to: James Bjork, Ph.D.
jbjork@mail.nih.gov. Please mark responses this RFI identifier NOT-DA-11-021. Reponses expected be longer approximately 2000 words. Respondents receive automated email confirmation acknowledging receipt their response, will receive individualized feedback. Any identifiers e.g., names, institutions, e-mail addresses, etc) be removed responses compiled. Only processed, anonymized results be shared internally the NIH Blueprint program staff leadership, appropriate. Nonetheless, proprietary information should submitted. Inquiries Please direct inquiries to: James M. Bjork, Ph.D. Clinical Neuroscience Branch Division Clinical Neuroscience Behavioral Research National Institute Drug Abuse National Institutes Health 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3172 Bethesda, MD 20892 Phone: 301) 443-3209 Email:
jbjork@mail.nih.gov